BotR, What was interesting about the end of the 18th century was the French Revolution, especially when General Berthier entered Rome, desposed the Pope and initiated the Repulic of Italy.
To lots of folk this looked like a resounding confirmation of a prediction madenearly a century before by the writer Robert Fleming. In 1701, Flemin wrote, based on his interpreation of the prophecies of Daniel:
"We may justly supose that the French monarchy, after it has scorched others, will itself consume by doing so - it's fire...towards the end of this century. I cannotbut hope that some new mortification of thechief supporters of the Antichrist will then happen; and perhaps the French monarchy may begin to be considerably humbled about that time." (Fleming. Quoted in Jonsson's Gentile Times p140)
Not suprisingly events at the end of the 18th century seemed to be a resounding confirmation of Fleming's approach to the date setting interpretation of prophecy. Lots offolk tried tobuild on Fleming's work but nobody ever came close to such an apparent success. As the 19th century progressed, Fleming's approach was gradually abandoned by the Protestant mainstream until it became at last the preserve of the sectarian fringe. C. T. Russell was the last to build a reasonable coherent system along the lines established during the century. When his system fell apart it was left to people who simply hadn't a clue about what Russell and his precursors had been doing, to attempt to patch things up. They failed miserably but their legacy still rumbles on.
Rob Crompton http://storytellersbible.blogspot.com